US Space Force

[dcfowler]

In the first, very vague hint of rank structure for the new US Space Force (Still to be approved by Congress), Space Policy Directive-4 was signed today, and included this passage:

"(b) The legislative proposal shall establish a Chief of Staff of the Space Force, who will be a senior military officer in the grade of General or Admiral, and who shall serve as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Interesting from the point of view of our niche (and somewhat nerdy) fascination with the minutiae of these things. So far they seem to be hedging their bets / keeping their options open...!


From a real-world point of view, however, my very subjective personal opinion is that this remains an un-needed political vanity project and a distraction which will waste a lot of time, effort and money -- all of which could arguably be better expended elsewhere.

The whole thing strikes me as the most glib marketing spin from the most arch of used-car-lot salesmen, diverting attention with grandiose plans to create a shiny new replacement for something that doesn't actually need to be replaced.

I fully accept that there are other equally valid opinions and that, as the saying goes, your mileage may vary...!

[dcfowler]

I have no love for the current Occupant, but putting that aside, will note that Russia has had a space force since 1992, and China has had a combined space/cyber force since 2016.

[marcpasquin]

I have no love for the current Occupant, but putting that aside, will note that Russia has had a space force since 1992, and China has had a combined space/cyber force since 2016.

So you're saying the president might be drawing inspiration from the russian on how to organise the military ? I'm sure there's nothing worrying there..... at least until they unveil the new uniforms for agents of the All-American Department of State Security.....

[dcfowler]

I have no love for the current Occupant, but putting that aside, will note that Russia has had a space force since 1992, and China has had a combined space/cyber force since 2016.

So you're saying the president might be drawing inspiration from the russian on how to organise the military ? I'm sure there's nothing worrying there..... at least until they unveil the new uniforms for agents of the All-American Department of State Security.....

Be snarky if you wish, but the land and naval environments have had their own services in most nations since the dawn on civilization. The air environment saw air forces coming into being between World Wars I and II. The space environment has been gradually maturing as a military domain since the 1950s, and can probably sustain a small service now; Plus, we now have the new cyber/electromagnetic warfare domain that is growing exponentially, and will undoubtably require a new service before too long. (Germany established one in 2015).

[marcpasquin]

I have no love for the current Occupant, but putting that aside, will note that Russia has had a space force since 1992, and China has had a combined space/cyber force since 2016.

So you're saying the president might be drawing inspiration from the russian on how to organise the military ? I'm sure there's nothing worrying there..... at least until they unveil the new uniforms for agents of the All-American Department of State Security.....

Be snarky if you wish, but the land and naval environments have had their own services in most nations since the dawn on civilization. The air environment saw air forces coming into being between World Wars I and II. The space environment has been gradually maturing as a military domain since the 1950s, and can probably sustain a small service now; Plus, we now have the new cyber/electromagnetic warfare domain that is growing exponentially, and will undoubtably require a new service before too long. (Germany established one in 2015).

I wasn't attacking the creation of new branches when new needs arise. I was joking about the fact that, considering the nature of the accusations faced by Trump, justifying one of his executive order by saying "russia's doing it" may take on added meaning even if unintended.

[dcfowler]

The proposed legislation has refined things a bit.

The chief of staff and vice chief of staff will both hold the rank of general.

The senior enlisted member will be the Chief Master Sergeant of The Space Force.

https://media.defense.gov/2019/Mar/01/2 ... OPOSAL.PDF

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Also interesting is the positioning of the proposed new Space Force within the Department of the Air Force, but separate from the Air Force itself, with a specified Under-Secretary to oversee the new service.

Unless they chose to do something very funky, such as a variation on the (naval-pattern) McPeak-style sleeve lace (which I somehow doubt...), it seems inevitable that the officer grade insignia will be the same as those already in use for the US Army and the US Air Force. It also seems likely that the enlisted grade insignia for the Space Force are likely to be derived from Air Force enlisted insignia. Assuming that this actually happens (which is by no means certain given the current composition of Congress), then I would guess that there is a good chance that initial uniforms and insignia will look a LOT like those of the USAF in the short- to medium-term, but may evolve later in to their own unique patterns and structures as the years go by — much as the Air Force insignia initially looked a lot like those of the USAAF from which it was derived. Specialty breast insignia will also likely follow USAF patterns, although it seems a safe bet that there will be some sort of generic badge for the service that will be derived from the current USAF Space Command emblems.

I’d be interested to see what they might do with service dress uniforms but my guess is that there is likely to be a fairly conservative and restrained approach, with something very close in style (if not identical to) the USAF-pattern of uniform, except with a change of the base colour to something like black or dark grey. Dark navy blue is also a definite possibility given that the Army, Navy and USMC all use this. For now, if I was a betting man, my money would be on black uniform and caps with light-grey shirts and black ties; black shoulder slides for shirts and sweaters.

Unless someone is very keen to go for a unique new look, I’d guess we will see the usual US Arms as the officer cap badge. It would also be interesting to see if they adopt the USAF-pattern clouds and lightning bolts for senior officer peak decoration (politely known as the farts-and-darts...) or if they chose to use some form of oak leaves like the army, the navy and the USMC. Each of the existing services has their own specific variations of bullion peak embroidery for senior officers, so there’s no reason why the USSF wouldn’t have something different again.

Given the likely Air Force heritage of the initial senior commanders of such a force, I can imagine that they would be more likely to favor adopting a space-specific variant of the farts-and-darts pattern, with two motifs on each side of the peak for Colonels and three on each side for general officers. What form those motifs may take is anyone’s guess! They could opt for either silver or gold as the main colour for cap badges and insignia but, again, the Air Force background would suggest silver is probably more likely. I also think that they will follow USAF traditions and that side caps are more likely to be used day-to-day than peaked service dress caps.

So that’s my guess (if it happens): USAF-style uniforms in black (or very dark grey...!) with light grey shirts and silver as the main colour for badges and officer cap embroidery and chin straps (if they don’t stick with plain black). I think they could do something a lot more interesting than that but I suspect that this is more likely what we’ll see.

I’m curious to see what you guys think.

[dcfowler]

I agree with your observations. Air Force uniforms with distinguishing insignia at the outset, gradually transitioning to service-unique uniforms, insignia, and perhaps rank titles over five years or so.

I never thought a Department of the Space Force was viable at the outset, so this approach seems sensible. I would have been onboard with a combined space and cyber service. I suspect that taking this more conservative approach will get enough support in Congress to get it passed. After all, it will only have around 15,000 members to begin with, so significantly smaller than the Coast Guard.

(Incidentally, the Army "navy blue" uniform will soon be reserved for formal occasions, as the World War II-era pinks and greens will be returning to service.

I'd bet on the USSF uniforms being black.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

I guess it's because its just seems to work better in my head, but the original concept of the United States Space Corps just sounds better to me than Space Force, which sounds a bit clunky. Maybe its just me...

I did read somewhere that, in due course, the intention, ultimately, would be to transition to a fully independent Department of the Space Force within the DoD.

The issue of uniforms and badges is rather secondary in the grand scheme of things but (a) it's what this forum is about and (b) I guess it will depend on just how much the new Chief of Staff thinks he needs to establish a specific "identity" for a nascent new service branch.

No matter what they do, there will inevitably be quite a lot of inter-service jokes about new uniforms, badges, starfleet without a starship, all that kind of thing. In fact, can you think of anything other than "Starfleet" catching on as the nickname for these guys by the other branches...? I suspect it is almost inevitable that there will be quite a lot of spoof posts with a variety of uniforms from the different eras of Star Trek once this gets up and running! Just look at all the comments when the USAF were trying out a variety of new designs for a service dress / formal uniform a few years ago...! If they do go with black or grey then I'm sure there will be plenty of pics using the Imperial forces from Star Wars too! If they are clever, they will anticipate this and get ahead of the game by playing on it themselves, rather than being all po-faced about it.

Edit:

Who am I kidding...
“Starship Troopers” is another prime candidate and comes with a ready-made list of memes for uniforms, insignia, recruiting posters, etc. Even Mel Brooks’ Star Wars parody Spaceballs has to be in the mix too...!! I’m sure everything as far back as the old Buster Crabbe black-and-white Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials will make an appearance at some point!!


On another note -- I'd completely forgotten about the official announcement on the pinks and greens (sorry, Army Greens -- they do know that no-one apart from senior leadership is ever gonna call them that, don't they...?). I guess it was always likely that some form of non-blue service / garrison dress was going to happen at some point and that the ASU would go back to being Dress Blues.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

I’m delving back into Forum history here, but how long do you think it will be before folks start finding this thread...

http://forum.uniforminsignia.org/viewtopic.php?f=125&t=5363

...and I wonder if we’ll see images “borrowed” from posts appearing on other sites?


It happened a while back when the AF we’re looking a new uniforms so I can imagine that people doing Google searches will find that thread!

[dcfowler]

Another question is what personnel in the sub-sergeant ranks will be called.

"Spaceman" seems like a non-starter.

Ideas?

[Medic_in_Uniform]

No idea...!!

At a wild guess, if this happens, it sounds like they will be a pretty small service and will likely be poaching suitably qualified applicants from the junior NCO grades of the other branches for a while before they are ready to start running Space Boot Camp on their own...!

Given the nature of the remit and mission they are proposing, is there even a role for basic squaddies at this point...?

Anyone else have any ideas?

[marcpasquin]

Another question is what personnel in the sub-sergeant ranks will be called.

"Spaceman" seems like a non-starter.

Ideas?

Space Cadet
Astroman
Red Shirt
Rocketeer

On a more serious level, I think that they might have to go with something more generic along the line of "Trooper" or "Serviceman". If they did want to include the word "space" in some way, they probably would have to create a neologism like "Space Operator" to avoid any existing connotation.

[marcpasquin]

I’m delving back into Forum history here, but how long do you think it will be before folks start finding this thread...

http://forum.uniforminsignia.org/viewtopic.php?f=125&t=5363

...and I wonder if we’ll see images “borrowed” from posts appearing on other sites?


It happened a while back when the AF we’re looking a new uniforms so I can imagine that people doing Google searches will find that thread!

Everytime Trump mentions the space force, I get a sudden bump on the number of view of my deviantart account because of the fictional space force ranks I posted some years ago.

https://www.deviantart.com/marcpasquin/art/US-Space-force-table-big-572891155

While that might sound like something good, it usually means that in the next day or 2, I or someone who know me will find the picture posted somewhere as the real deal and I'll have to try and have the info corrected.

for example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/army/comments/8s34jh/space_force_rank_structure_its_happening_next/

https://www.stardomspace.com/u-s-space-force-is-it-wise-or-even-legal/

[dcfowler]

At a wild guess, if this happens, it sounds like they will be a pretty small service and will likely be poaching suitably qualified applicants from the junior NCO grades of the other branches for a while before they are ready to start running Space Boot Camp on their own...

The bulk of the personnel will come from Air Force Space Command (7 space wings), and a smaller number from the Army Space and Missile Defense Command (2 brigades). Even smaller numbers coming from the Navy and Marine Corps.

Per a DOD press release: "Pending passage, DOD will begin transferring personnel from the Air Force to the new service in fiscal year 2021 -- most of the personnel in the U.S. Space Force will come from the Air Force. Army, Navy and Marine Corps personnel will be affected in later years."

and

"On the military side, the service will look for individuals who will build the culture of the new service. “We want people to be recruited into the Space Force as similar to the way the Marine Corps recruits Marines,” a senior official said. “We don’t recruit [Marines] into the Navy -- they go after the specific kind of people with a vision that is necessary to build that culture.”"

[dcfowler]

An agreement has been reached in Congress to create and fund the Space Force. A vote could occur within the next week. Once signed into law, the Department of the Air Force will establish the timetable for standing up the new service, sometime in 2020.

[jrichardn2]

The relevant section of the House's bill call it a "Space Corps", but the conference report calls it the U.S. Space Force, so I guess that's what they'll go with. The Commandant/Commander (seen both) will be a General, and a member of the JCS. The Department of the Air Force is to come up with a transition plan. I'm supposing that this forum will see a lot of activity as the Department cooks up various transitional arrangements with respect to uniforms and ranks. (Of course transferred service members retain their grade.)

[Torg003]

The biggest question to be answered is, "Will there be Space Marines?"

[dcfowler]

Space Corps was in the House bill from about a year ago. The compromise legislation, passed by the House last week, and the Senate this week both use the name Space Force, a new Title 10 armed service. As soon as the president-who-shall-not-be named signs it, probably this week, it will be law.

Chief of Space Operations it the title of the commander, who will dual-hat as COMSPACECOM for the first year, and then the billets will split. After one year, the CSO will become a permanent member of the JCS.

Presumably USAF-style grades will be used, at least initially, though that is not yet written in stone.

My understanding is that after signature, there will be a 90 day standup period to get a small HQ element established, which will deal with organization, uniforms, insignia, ranks, flags, etc. Guessing that formal establishment will occur around Oct 1, 2020, though the service should have lineage back to 1982, when Space Command was established, just like how the USAF, established in 1947, has lineage back to 1907.

Most of the operational units will be transferred over in late 2020/early 2021.

[marcpasquin]

Space Corps was in the House bill from about a year ago. The compromise legislation, passed by the House last week, and the Senate this week both use the name Space Force, a new Title 10 armed service. As soon as the president-who-shall-not-be named signs it, probably this week, it will be law.

Chief of Space Operations it the title of the commander, who will dual-hat as COMSPACECOM for the first year, and then the billets will split. After one year, the CSO will become a permanent member of the JCS.

Presumably USAF-style grades will be used, at least initially, though that is not yet written in stone.

My understanding is that after signature, there will be a 90 day standup period to get a small HQ element established, which will deal with organization, uniforms, insignia, ranks, flags, etc. Guessing that formal establishment will occur around Oct 1, 2020, though the service should have lineage back to 1982, when Space Command was established, just like how the USAF, established in 1947, has lineage back to 1907.

Most of the operational units will be transferred over in late 2020/early 2021.

How much of the personnel being transferred *does not* come from the USAF ? It seems like if non-air force personnel only represents a small fraction of the whole, we might see "adapted air force" type insignias rather than something made from scratch. For example, medium rather than dark blue as the base colour of uniforms and NCO insignias that use the same incrementations as USAF but with straight horizontal lower bars instead of curvy ones like some experimental ones back in the 50s:

[marcpasquin]

This article has some insignias suggestion and makes the point that the Space Force could potentially be an all-officer (warrant and commissioned) service

https://www.science20.com/hontas_farmer/space_force_a_service_of_warrior_geeks_an_opinion_on_uniforms_and_insignia_with_practical_justifications-232953

[dcfowler]

How much of the personnel being transferred *does not* come from the USAF ? It seems like if non-air force personnel only represents a small fraction of the whole, we might see "adapted air force" type insignias rather than something made from scratch. For example, medium rather than dark blue as the base colour of uniforms and NCO insignias that use the same incrementations as USAF but with straight horizontal lower bars instead of curvy ones like some experimental ones back in the 50s:

Initially, all the transferred personnel will come from the Air Force, mostly Air Force Space Command (though there are other space billets elsewhere). I think that there is a high likelihood that some, though not all, Army assets will be merged with the USSF within three years. Down the road, perhaps some Navy and USMC personnel, but probably not in great numbers.

For comparison, the USAF has six space wings, and the Army has three space brigades. USN/USMC personnel seem to be concentrated at the Naval Satellite Operations Center.

[dcfowler]

This article has some insignias suggestion and makes the point that the Space Force could potentially be an all-officer (warrant and commissioned) service

https://www.science20.com/hontas_farmer/space_force_a_service_of_warrior_geeks_an_opinion_on_uniforms_and_insignia_with_practical_justifications-232953

It won't be. The Air Force doesn't have any warrant officers, and most space operators are enlisted personnel.

Roughly 75% of AFSPC personnel are enlisted.

[dcfowler]

Was signed into law Dec. 20. Service is officially established.

[jrichardn2]

The Space Force has stood up its web site (spaceforce.mil) and has a FAQ on this. Here's a clip from https://www.defensenews.com/breaking-ne ... t-service/:

All the fun cultural details — the Space Force emblem, what personnel will call themselves, whether they wear Star Trek uniforms — are still being formulated.

“It’s going to be really important that we get this right. A uniform. A patch. A song. It gets to the culture of a service,” Raymond said. “So we’re not going to be in a rush to get something, and not do that right. There’s a lot of work going on towards that end. I don’t think it’s going to take a long time to get that done, but that’s not something we’re going to roll out on day one.”

Air Force bases centered around space operations — specifically Peterson, Buckley and Schriever AFB in Colorado; Vandenberg AFB in California; Patrick AFB in Florida and others — will likely be renamed to reflect that they are Space Force bases, Raymond said.

The Space Force may also diverge from the Air Force’s organization into squadrons and wings, he said.

“We have an opportunity. We looked at and will continue to look at different organizational constructs,” Raymond said.

The hope is to nail down these details “much sooner than 18 months,” said a senior Air Force official who spoke to reporters on background.

Asked whether a red shirt was being considered as part of the Space Force uniform — an allusion to the Star Trek series, where personnel wearing red shirts were seen by the fanbase as being more frequently killed off than other characters — another senior Air Force official jokingly stated that particular color scheme is not currently under consideration.

[jrichardn2]

So there's going to be a lot in this forum on this as 2020 advances.

My guess is that the USAF rank structure will mostly be preserved, but I could be wrong. If I'm right I'm wondering what will happen with E-1 through E-4: "airman" seems wrong, but so does "spaceman". I'm seeing members of the USSF already being referred to as "space operator", so that may be it.

[dcfowler]

So there's going to be a lot in this forum on this as 2020 advances.

My guess is that the USAF rank structure will mostly be preserved, but I could be wrong. If I'm right I'm wondering what will happen with E-1 through E-4: "airman" seems wrong, but so does "spaceman". I'm seeing members of the USSF already being referred to as "space operator", so that may be it.

The NDAA only mentions rank once, that the chief of space operations will be a general. The draft legislation from the DOD, also mentioned a Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force.

So, it's entirely possible that they hew closely to the USAF structure, or modify enlisted ranks...it's also not impossible that they stake out their own identity by adopting naval-ish ranks, as many have advocated (Both the differentiate the service from the USAF, and because space operations are more analogous to naval, rather than air operations.

It will be an interesting six to nine months!

[Medic_in_Uniform]

I wonder if we'll see a bump in Forum traffic and a re-increase in general interest in all things to do with uniforms and insignia as this progresses.

It'll be fascinating to see what choices they ultimately make and, for once, to follow this in real-time rather than to have to trawl back through historical documents.

There will still be jokes and memes a-plenty...

[dcfowler]

The first report on recommendations for organization of the service is due Feb 1. Perhaps there will be some hints of ranks, seals, etc. then.

[dcfowler]

https://www.rollcall.com/news/pentagon-talk-space-force-plans-uniforms-trump

"Besides being prepared to show Trump the logo ideas, the military leaders will be ready to talk about the subject of uniforms and to describe proposed rank structures and organizational charts, according to the Pentagon official."

[marcpasquin]

https://www.rollcall.com/news/pentagon-talk-space-force-plans-uniforms-trump

"Besides being prepared to show Trump the logo ideas, the military leaders will be ready to talk about the subject of uniforms and to describe proposed rank structures and organizational charts, according to the Pentagon official."

If Trump is involved in the design of the uniforms, I would imagine that the service is going to get Gold highlights at the bare minimum.

[dcfowler]

Let us hope that he stays out of it.

[dcfowler]

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/17/space-force-offers-first-peek-new-camouflage-uniform.html?fbclid=IwAR21mvTvdU66A701Y0fzZjqwX73hi7leh9nClymYZrwPaI3TEXDoc9bg_ZY

[marcpasquin]

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/17/space-force-offers-first-peek-new-camouflage-uniform.html?fbclid=IwAR21mvTvdU66A701Y0fzZjqwX73hi7leh9nClymYZrwPaI3TEXDoc9bg_ZY

Kind of make sense, budget wise, that they would reuse available uniforms for the first iteration.

[dcfowler]

Actually Congress ordered the abolishment of service-specific camouflage uniforms 2-3 years ago. So, all the services are required to wear the same thing now.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Really...?!

I’d say “Let the Star Trek jokes begin...” but the Interweb and the Twittersphere have long-since beaten us to it — and they have, not surprisingly, been pretty unmerciful!

Now, in fairness, yes, it absolutely does borrow quite extensively from the previously established emblems of US Air Force Space Command (and the “orbit” component from the NASA “meatball” logo) but surely *someone* MUST have been aware of the Star Trek similarities before they presented this to the White House as one of the options for consideration?! I can only assume that they *did* know but couldn’t help themselves, knowing that Trump would likely go ahead and select it!

Oh well, at least there’s now a “historical” basis for the evolution of the Starfleet emblem!

2214DF2B-3328-47CB-A50B-9334AC533449.png (181.18 KiB) Viewed 11291 times

[dcfowler]

The delta has a long history of use in Air Force space and flight test organizational patches, going back to the early 1960s, and thus, predating Star Trek.

The earliest example I know of is the 36th Fighter Group that has the exact same delta, and was approved in June 1940. It's worth noting that Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry served in the USAAF in that era, and likely was aware of it.

So, in the competition of chicken and the egg, the Air Force came first, by 26 years.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Oh, I agree — the delta, in and of itself, is not something I would dispute. The arrowhead or delta symbol is a component of many USAF unit insignia. It appears in some shape or form on the emblems of most Space-related squadrons (not surprising given its prominence on the Space Command emblem) but is also on a fair few non-Space units too. Some have a very thin and narrow form (like 36th Wing) and some have broad, squat proportions but it’s the same basic symbol.

The heritage is plainly there to see as an established part of the old USAF Space Command insignia but the changes they have made to the overall design just bring it that much closer to the fictional versions from Star Trek. And, yes, Roddenberry flew with the USAAF in WW2, albeit in bombers.

Any use of the delta, even a simple re-use if the old Space Command badge was always going to invite Star Trek comparisons. Given that this option was one of several presented for consideration, I’d be very curious to see what the alternatives were and whether there were any that were not quite so blatantly similar to the Starfleet seal.

[marcpasquin]

Given that this option was one of several presented for consideration, I’d be very curious to see what the alternatives were and whether there were any that were not quite so blatantly similar to the Starfleet seal.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/video/vp-pence-unveils-proposal-us-space-force-57135958

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Aren’t those the slightly dubious ones put out by the Trump campaign team a few months back, rather than official ones from the DoD / Dept of the Air Force...?

[marcpasquin]

Aren’t those the slightly dubious ones put out by the Trump campaign team a few months back, rather than official ones from the DoD / Dept of the Air Force...?

I hope so.

I do wonder though if any were included in the proposal presented to Trump to make the generals' preferred choice more appealing in comparison.

[dcfowler]

Yes, those were just promotional crapola produced by his political campaign people. Nothing to do at all with reality.

Returning to the delta, I think suggests strongly that it will appear on the cap badge and other insignia.

[marcpasquin]

Returning to the delta, I think suggests strongly that it will appear on the cap badge and other insignia.

Apart from Beret badge, isn't the badge worn by other services either the national emblem or a rank insignia ?

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Yep. It's either the US coat of arms for the Army and subsequently USAF, which evolved from it, or a variant of a service-specific emblem for the USN / USMC / USCG, all of which incorporate the US eagle and the universal maritime symbol of the anchor.

I guess a lot of this will depend on how much Gen. Raymond wants to follow his Air Force heritage versus establishing something unique for an entirely new service.

If I was looking at this from scratch, I'd be thinking about how these things develop over time but also how it's important to establish the service as a part of the US armed services, not some goofy-looking Sci-Fi spin-off. In some ways, it doesn't matter if they use black, grey, navy blue or even AF blue for the service dress to begin with; the same for silver versus gold for badges and buttons -- these things can always evolve.

My best guess is that we will see them retain the US coat of arms as the main service dress cap badge -- larger for officers and smaller, on a backing disk, for enlisted in much the same way as used for the the Army and USAF. My logic here is that this clearly sets the link to the USAF and, before that, back to the US Army. I also suspect the the main emblem from the seal, the Delta / arrowhead, superimposed on the globe (with or without the encircling "orbit" feature), will look just too much like a cheap costume from a sci-fi movie and therefore using the US coat of arms will look much more "official" and "military."

Having said that, I think that the Delta and Globe (gotta call it something and the USMC already have the EGA, right...?) will likely become the Space Force's equivalent of the USAF star and wings. As such, it's the obvious emblem to put on things like the buttons of Service Dress uniforms, a generic service patch for working dress, maybe even a cap badge for working dress covers or flight caps / garrison caps. I also suspect it will become the central emblem of things like USSF pilot wings (and other similar operational qualifications or careers badges) -- the older form, from the USAF Space Command badge is already in the center of the USAF Space Operations badge.

I would also guess that the Delta and Globe will very likely become the main emblem above (or within) whatever pattern of chevrons (+/- rockers) they opt to use for enlisted grade insignia. Officer metal insignia (and the embroidered equivalents) will likely be unchanged from the standard pattern used in some shape or form by all the US armed services.

[dcfowler]

While the basic cap badge will probably be a variation of the coat of arms, I strongly believe that the delta will be incorporated into it in some fashion, perhaps as a modified crest.

I am also going to say, that although they may not ultimately use naval rank titles, that they will probably split the difference and use silver sleeve stripes, and not pin-on insignia on epaulets.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

Yes, I wondered about that too. I suspect, however, that the memory of the McPeak sleeve insignia will live long in the memory of USAF officers (and not in a good way...!) so I have a feeling that there will be a cultural drive to stay away from silver sleeve lace. I think it’ll be a long time before we see naval-type sleeve insignia for anything other than naval-type ranks in the US.

It’s a shame really as something like the four-pocket Coast Guard service dress uniform but in dark grey with silver stripes would actually work pretty well and would certainly give USSF a clear visual identity as a new service — but I just don’t see it happening.

I think it all hinges on how much Gen. Raymond is influenced by his Air Force heritage versus how much he wants to strike out and establish something new. My betting is that we’ll see a more “military”-looking service dress than the current Air Force service dress. In other words, a “proper” four button / four pocket tunic rather than the the current USAF uniform that still looks like a three-button civilian business suit with shoulder straps.

Black, dark navy blue and grey are all in the running as potential uniform colors. I don’t know if it’s a clue that they used navy blue for the name tapes on the camouflage utility uniform that was posted online or whether that’s just an initial temporary place-holder while they get everything sorted.

[Medic_in_Uniform]

OK, some very quick ideas.

I fully expect, though, that the actual US Space Force service dress uniforms will look nothing like this. (I also fully expect to find these drawing all over the internet purporting to be official images over the next few weeks, 'cos that's just what people are like...).

My best guess is that the colour choice for service dress will come down to:
black / dark navy blue / grey (dark or mid shades).

Black has roots in the old USAF black uniforms, suggests Space and is clearly different to the other services at present. It could be seen as a bit severe though and there may be historical connotations they don't want to evoke.

Navy Blue is well-established for the Navy, Army ASU / dress uniforms and the USMC. This may be seen as being just too similar to the other services. With silver badges and buttons it just looks a lot like USAF uniform in a darker shade!

Grey is a viable alternative option that is also different to what the other services have at present. There is historical precedent with the USN grey service dress from WW2 but that hasn't been in use since 1949, seventy years ago! For a new and distinctive look, this is probably the route I would take but, inevitably, there will be comments about mail men and Greyhound bus drivers (you can't please all the people all of the time...). This is where using the US coat of arms for the cap badge helps to establish a military "look" and is immediately recognisable in a way that a new, service-specific badge perhaps would not be. That can, however, always be updated in the future...

Gold or silver buttons and badges is another question. Either would work but I have opted to show these with silver, simply because I suspect that Gen. Raymond is likely to follow his Air Force heritage in regard to this. Similarly, oak leaves or USAF clouds-and-lightning (the farts-and-darts...) for senior officers' service dress caps...? Again, either would work and the best option would be something new and specific to the USSF but, for now, I have opted use the USAF-style peak decoration, as a place-holder, if nothing else.


Some possible colours:

US Space Force uniform proposals (possible basic colors)

Potential uniform variants -- General Officer shown

US Space Force uniform proposals (general officer shown)

Range of service dress A (formal) and B (working) for officer and enlisted grades

Service Dress A is for formal events (and likely Washington DC). It has white shirt and black tie; dark grey trousers match the coat and have black braid stripes (see below); officers wear bullion chin straps.

Service dress B is general non-field working dress; it has mid-grey pants (without stripes) and plain black leather chin straps for all grades. Shirt and tie are a lighter grey. A dark grey v-neck sweater with shoulder patches and pen-pockets is optional for office wear. Rank for shirts and sweaters is worn on dark grey soft shoulder slides by all grades.

A dark grey "bomber" jacket is optional for wear over the sweater. US flag on one sleeve, USSF patch (per the published image of the seal) on the other sleeve, both in full color).

Dark grey garrison caps may be worn; black piping for enlisted, black and silver for officers and all-silver for general officers. Pin-on metal rank insignia on one side and the Space Force delta-and-globe badge on the other (similar to USN officers' garrison cap).

US Space Force service dress uniform proposals (A and B variants)

US Space Force uniform proposals (garrison caps)

Service Dress officer rank
No changes from the currently established metal insignia used by all the US armed services. Sleeve braid is 0.5 inch for company grade officers, 1 inch for field grade officers, 2 inch for general officers.

US Space Force Officer rank (service dress)

Ceremonial officer shoulder boards and accoutrements; the background color is black
(Presumably also for Mess Dress, similar to the USAF pattern.)

US Space Force Officer rank (ceremonial)

First pass at enlisted grade insignia
There are quite a few of these appearing online but many are very complex and not easy to recognise at-a-glance. I have therefore tried to keep these much simpler in their shape and form. The basic chevron shape is derived from the base of the delta and by adding the delta component above the chevrons I have tried to make the Master Sergeants immediately identifiable, even at a distance. I guess these versions would be metal pin-on for the top row and embroidered shoulder slides for the bottom row. Full size insignia for upper sleeves would be worn on service dress jackets.

They're OK, but I think I can improve on these. The titles for the grades are based on USAF grades but are entirely hypothetical; we have no idea what they'll actually use!

US Space Force Enlisted rank v1

Finally a few variations on logos, wings and roundels using the delta and the five point star as the core components. The form of the delta is essentially a five point star with the two side points removed, so the two shapes work well together.

US Space Force - various logo and roundel designs

[dcfowler]

The enlisted concepts are good although I didn't care for the 1st Sergeant variants.

They'll also need an USSF version for the SEAC, though I expect that it will be awhile before there is one from the USSF.

I always thought gray uniforms would be good for a future, notional US Cyber Force.

[marcpasquin]

OK, some very quick ideas.

First pass at enlisted grade insignia

I think the second is more easily "readable" than the first. I'm not a fan of the variant stripes with the double arrow as, unlike stars for example, they are not something which is is used multiple times on any flags or emblem.